Commentary on the Spanish Supreme Court Judgments of June 4 and June 26, 2018 on various issues in matters of expropriation

the task of the jurisprudence in the "restoration" of the Law of December 16, 1954. Pending issues and limits to this commendable effort

Authors

  • Darío Canterla Muñoz Attorney at law. Junta de Andalucía. Spain.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46735/raap.n102.1061

Abstract

The present work is based on the work of “conservation and restoration” carried out by the jurisprudence for the maintenance of the “legal monument” of the Forced Expropriation Law of 1954. The study focuses on commenting on the STS of June 4, 2018, which interprets the Additional Provision of the aforementioned Law and the STS of June 26, 2018, establishing what are the requirements for public information in the emergency procedure. Finally points out outstanding issues in the field warning about the need to return to the concern of the legislator and public managers about this situation given that the jurisprudence is limited in this commendable work by the principle of legality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2018-12-31

How to Cite

Canterla Muñoz, D. (2018). Commentary on the Spanish Supreme Court Judgments of June 4 and June 26, 2018 on various issues in matters of expropriation: the task of the jurisprudence in the "restoration" of the Law of December 16, 1954. Pending issues and limits to this commendable effort. Revista Andaluza De Administración Pública, (102), 187–219. https://doi.org/10.46735/raap.n102.1061

Issue

Section

JURISPRUDENCE