Aesop and Andalusian urbanism: comment on the ruling of the Constitutional Court 25/2024, of February 13, about the LISTA

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46735/raap.n117.1413

Keywords:

urban planning law of Andalusia, unconstitutionality appeal, ruling 25/2024, land uses, treatment of rural land, in homes on rural land, livestock trails, mining uses, constitutionality of the law

Abstract

In December 2021, Law 7/2021 (LISTA) was published. In it, new regulatory criteria were adopted for the regulation of urban planning and territorial planning in that autonomous community. One of the main bets focused on the original land classification proposal, which very significantly affected the possibilities of using rural land. They were bold and disruptive proposals with respect to the traditional status quo. This rule was the subject of an unconstitutionality appeal that was resolved by ruling of the Constitutional Court 25/2024, of February 13, which is the object of our analysis. The result of his diagnosis has been the confirmation of the constitutional accommodation of practically all of the challenged precepts, with certain exceptions related to the authorizing regime of mining uses on rural land, the treatment of livestock trails affected by urban transformation processes and the prohibition of certain homes on rural land that were linked to extraordinary uses on that type of land. The rest has been confirmed in its constitutionality by the aforementioned ruling. The added legal security that this entails for Andalusian urban planning is the most significant consequence of this constitutional resolution.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BASSOLS COMA, M., “Inconstitucionalidad final de la normativa sobre liberalización del suelo y reapertura del debate sobre la competencia del Estado en materia urbanística: a propósito del Voto particular a la STC 137/2011, de 14 de septiembre”, Cuadernos de Derecho Local (QDL) ISSN: 1696-0955, núm. 30, octubre de 2012, p. 37-57 Fundación Democracia y Gobierno Local.

FERNANDEZ TORRES, J. R., “En busca de una política territorial inteligente y conciliadora. A propósito de la Ley madrileña 5/2012, de 20 de diciembre, de viviendas rurales sostenibles”, Revista Aranzadi de Urbanismo y Edificación (2013) nº 28.

JORDANO FRAGA, J., “La reclasificación del suelo no urbanizable”, monografía asociada a la Revista Aranzadi de Urbanismo y Edificación número 21, Ed. Thomson Reuters Aranzadi, Pamplona 2009.

LÓPEZ BENÍTEZ, M., en “Las medidas de adecuación ambiental y territorial de las edificaciones irregulares”. En obra colectiva “Un nuevo paradigma en el urbanismo andaluz (análisis de la Ley 7/2021, de impulso para la sostenibilidad del territorio en Andalucía)”, editorial Civitas Thomson Reuters, Pamplona 2022.

MARTIN VALDIVIA, S. M.; “La Ley de Vivienda 12/2023, una visión desde el derecho público. «Nihil novum sub sole»”, en Revista Aranzadi de Urbanismo y Edificación, Número 51, 2023.

REBOLLO PUIG, M., en “Disciplina urbanística: restablecimiento de la legalidad e inspección”, en obra colectiva “Un nuevo paradigma en el urbanismo andaluz (análisis de la Ley 7/2021, de impulso para la sostenibilidad del territorio en Andalucía)”, editorial Civitas Thomson Reuters, Pamplona 2022.

VERA JURADO, D. y RANDO BURGOS, E., “La ordenación territorial”, en obra colectiva “Un nuevo paradigma en el urbanismo andaluz (análisis de la Ley 7/2021, de impulso para la sostenibilidad del territorio en Andalucía)”, editorial Civitas Thomson Reuters, Pamplona 2022.

Published

2024-09-17

How to Cite

Martín Valdivia, S. M. (2024). Aesop and Andalusian urbanism: comment on the ruling of the Constitutional Court 25/2024, of February 13, about the LISTA. Revista Andaluza De Administración Pública, (117), 229–271. https://doi.org/10.46735/raap.n117.1413

Issue

Section

JURISPRUDENCE COMMENTS