The archaeological action against building works

Abstract

Building works often imply the need for archaeological activities. In this article it is examined if those activities should be undertaken and financed by the promoters of the works or by the Public Administration. The solution which was reached by the state and regional legislation is exposed. It is emphasized that regional legislation deviates significantly from the provisions of state legislation and, at the same time, reveals many differences between them. The differences are aggravated by the interference of the urban development plan, administrative practices and the various interpretations of the courts. The resulting system is criticized and proposals for changes are made, so that state legislation might guarantee a minimum of equality and rationality of the system.