Procedural defense options in case of firmness of acts, regulations or sentences

Abstract

This work explores possible defense spaces in complicated situations in which the individual does not have any possibility of appeal. It is, first, to provide a systematic approach to possible situations, since there is special confusion when it comes to focusing on these issues. Second, identify problems around these types of situations and provide some possible solutions. For this, third, the method will have to be, fundamentally, a contribution of criteria that operate in the legal practice. The procedural options of the indirect contentious-administrative appeal against general provisions are discussed, for example, through the possibilities of attacking a firm act taking advantage from the existence of a subsequent sentence that contradicts it ; defense margins are explored granted by the judged thing itself (and its relations also with the withdrawal and sentences of inadmissibility), as well as the extraordinary appeal for review of the LRJAPPAC 30/1992, the review of sentences of article 102 of the LRJCA 29/1998 and the ex officio review of null administrative acts of lien.